General stage

With much gratitude we wish to note that back in 2001 while working on his own monograph on cancer helped me a lot of M. Jolondz Cancer nothing but the truth. " What attention was drawn? It was voiced by a very interesting new view of "natural selection at the cellular level." Even then, it became apparent weighty addition to the protective mechanisms of the body, which is made by the author. From my heart I thank M. Jolondz.

It was impossible not to agree with this interesting finding. Even then, it became apparent that "Natural Selection at the cellular level, without a doubt is the case, but, alas, he was predictably too big place and role in the protective mechanisms of the body. Each exists in nature plays a very important role, a characteristic.

And so, beginning in 2008 gave me two more books of Mark Jolondz; a "Cancer" (2000) and "The new practice healing cancer" (2007). They particularly noted the new thinking of the author and the desire to deal with this problem. If you be honest, after the first acquaintance I have not read any more books this amazing author. Why?? Probably was not ready to discuss with him.

With a great desire to know began to study and analyze the material in these books. Waiting to see something brand new, is not justified. Although the author's interesting remarks in these books abound.

And what is most interesting is the fact that there brand name viagra was a backlash. The desire to express some of their own and may not be too unflattering views of the author. I think that M. Jolondz on me will not mind.

Why is there this contradiction? Only because the author notes many mistakes, both in theory and in methods of treatment, and at the same time talking about the same as those opponents, who criticized and refuted.

There is a golden rule: - "If you know how to criticize, then Learn to see and offer a way." How not to seem strange, Mark Jolondz indeed with a deep knowledge was able to see many of the negative side, both in traditional and nontraditional in oncology, this is a great and worthy of respect for the work presented in these books. He is worthy of deep respect. But the material for his work given by those who criticized, and they also deserve no less respect.

We forget that there is a salty and sweet, hot and cold ... and it all together. Also positive developments in science can not exist without the erroneous conclusions, because then there will be a whole one theory.

When criticizing, it is necessary to explain the nature of the object. And when it nobody knows, we can say anything. And there were no exceptions, that on this basis were not as opponents and supporters. Secondly, most always. M. Jolondz really brought a lot of medical science. In my opinion, the most important - is the hypothesis of natural selection, the ability to identify the negative aspects of traditional medicine.

But, unfortunately, and he could not open light on the nature of cancer. In the same way as it failed to do his opponents. Can more naturally suited to the author of pathology at the next her, like his opponents, he has not moved.

Praise the Lord that all the negative realities do not go away from our eyes, as they always show a negative and painful. And it is enough to show some effort to be expanded into one category or another. Very, very difficult to see the positive, or what happens to the occurrence of negative realities.

Alas, in these books are not traced or a new approach to immune defense, nor a new theory of cancer, nor in the treatment of this disease, either in prevention. Yes, there are interesting ideas, but they were expressed earlier and others, and ways of treatment - has already been applied. Refine and improve that a great mistake let predecessors, who have much more complicated than followers. As in the conventional theory about cancer and treatment of this disease, all conclusions are based only on already arisen pathology, cancer cells and tumors. Continues to hold the same basic common mistake - we continue to delve into a fait accompli. Cancer cells and cancer - this is just the end result of the disease, and therefore its study and struggle with him nothing ever will the disclosure of the cancer process.

The fight with any problems is always generates more and more new problems. This is not oprovergaemo and it proved life. If it were not so, for a long time to cancer would have been a number of unresolved diseases. But, alas. Therefore it is necessary to struggle with problems, but look for a different approach.

I'll try to explain the above and below show some of the statements (in italics) M. Jolondz of his books.

- The preface states: "Lack of medical practice, reliable and safe means of fighting cancer ever causes multiple anti-cancer" sensationalism ".

Since I can not agree, because it is fundamentally wrong! Indeed, there is a reliable and safe means of fighting cancer! And why not? This question no one tries to explain. Sensations are generated only by the fact that until now the mystery of cancer was not disclosed!

Excuse me, but you can not deny both treatments used medicine! Absolutely can not blindly follow conventional wisdom, and then deny, are standard treatments in medicine. If we are profitable we use something - if not, then we denies of that something.

It must be noted that the official oncology similar law when he claims that in non-traditional practice is also no reliable and safe means to fight cancer, which are also constantly generate any sensation.

But it should be noted that in both traditional and alternative medicine, there are cases of successful healing of cancer patients. These facts are, and how would someone not want to, they can not deny! The only thing that brings them together, so this is as traditional and alternative medicine is struggling with the elimination of cancerous cells, the elimination of the tumor, and no one nor the other can not clearly explain the case of a successful recovery. Therefore, it becomes possible for each to pull the blanket over himself.

Once again, it should be noted that numerous anticancer sensations are generated only - there is no precise and complete mechanism for the emergence and development of cancer, which would explain the case of a successful recovery. Cancer remains a mystery. Lack of knowledge about the cancer process and can not find and develop safe and effective treatments. This is Viagra the search for drugs fertile ground for all kinds of speculation.

- From the preface: "the salvation of healthy people from cancer of the author sees in the struggle with external carcinogens and in the active primary prevention of cancer. Under the active prevention of cancer means the normalization of the supply of oxygen by cells was first proposed by the author of normalization of blood pressure in the pulmonary circulation and normalization of thyroid hormone thyroxine in blood. "

Already at first sight an obvious error in the representation of an incomplete picture - and how to deal with internal carcinogens? And how do deal with carcinogens? How does the oxygen in the accumulation of carcinogens? Clearly visible error. Can not be lack of oxygen to turn a healthy cell into a cancer. At least, no one has yet been able to accomplish this in an experiment. Also, the effect of thyroxine on such a transformation is questionable. Again, it becomes apparent that all disputes can be removed only to disclose the mystery of cancer. And it is unclear why the author proposes the normalization of the blood supply cells with oxygen and then in the works - already pointed oxygen as an enemy of the patient? So after all, oxygen is harmful or not?

Any method that aims to support the body in any pathology will give a certain result. Prevention was always an effective way. But it turns into nothing when we do not know what is happening in the body with cancer or other diseases. There is no doubt that if a person is prevented from entering the body of various carcinogens, then the cancer will not arise. This two and two together. But this is not prevention, is a way of life. People the right to choose himself, or not to accept the poison. Similarly, with respect to carcinogens. Therefore, we can clearly say that the primary prevention - it is a normal way of life. And most importantly here, we always create their own problems, and then fight with them. No need to fight with carcinogens, and the need to create an environment in which nature will be exposed to fewer carcinogens from our results of operations for the sake of themselves.

- M. Jolondz wrote: - "The cells of malignant tumors differ rampant quantitative growth, at some stage of their development, they penetrate into the surrounding tissue, they are aggressive, in blood, and especially the lymphatic vessels are transferred to the nearest lymph nodes and even in the remotest parts of the body, forming where secondary tumors - metastasis.

It is generally accepted views (the author relies on them) until you make it possible to get close to the mystery of cancer, and this means that in them something is not right! Indeed, cancer cells grow uncontrollably. And it has long been known, and it's main features and differences of cancer from other diseases.

But someone and have ever seen is how cancer cells travel through vessels and tissues of the body?? The same, no one has ever seen. And anyone can imagine a situation where cancer cells have traveled peacefully tissues throughout the body. The presence of antibodies to cancer cells in blood, still does not give us reason to say that traveling cancer cells themselves.

Standard diagnosis
Millennium